Customer Journey

To promote consistency and standardization in our customer journeys across Nordea, a colleague and I took the initiative to develop common templates. The challenge we faced was the existence of numerous formats for our customer journeys, which made it difficult to interpret and compare content across business areas. Our efforts involved optimizing and enhancing the way we work with customer journeys. As a result, we created three templates and trained our colleagues to use them. This led to increased visibility of customer pain points and needs across internal business areas, resulting in better and more coherent end-to-end customer experiences.

Customer Journey

To promote consistency and standardization in our customer journeys across Nordea, a colleague and I took the initiative to develop common templates. The challenge we faced was the existence of numerous formats for our customer journeys, which made it difficult to interpret and compare content across business areas. Our efforts involved optimizing and enhancing the way we work with customer journeys. As a result, we created three templates and trained our colleagues to use them. This led to increased visibility of customer pain points and needs across internal business areas, resulting in better and more coherent end-to-end customer experiences.

Outcome: 3 Journey templates
Level 1. High level template (as-is) are typically based on research & data which makes it indispensable when cross-functional teams have to work together to optimise or create new customer experiences. ​​​​​​​
Level 2. Flow template (as-is) are typically used to validate flows or services either as a UX analysis or up against strategic priorities to highlight critical touch points that should be optimised. 
Level 3. Workshop template (to-be) is used as a workshop format during collaboration across teams. Focus here is on the to-be experience.
Below is part of our teaching material

Other cases

Back to Top